Keep your stick, chewing gum, and mirror handy |
I took a beating the other night on Facebook. It wasn’t a
big, nasty, knockdown sort of beating; it was more like a sucker punch in the
gut beating. But, as one who was smacked by a pair of virtual brass knuckles,
the butt of a gun argument, and one or two other saps and tire irons wielded by
disgruntled haters who pretty much wore masks crafted to look like nice people,
I was more than a little wounded in the heart and spirit. Once I admitted the
pummeling to my FB friends, I was heartened by the outpouring of genuine
kindness and advice I received within minutes of my confession. To my caring
cadre of compaƱeros, I say
thank you.
Most of us who have been using and/or watching Facebook for
a few years can attest to a shift in how Facebook’s algorithms, news feed
selections, friendship requests, and myriad technical and marketing things
about which I know nothing, have taken the site from generally congenial to, in
some sad instances, downright vicious and venal. It has become a portal for
misinformation, disinformation, shouting, demonizing, plagiarizing, dehumanizing,
and a dozen other “‘izings” that are not helpful or healthful to those in the
community who still believe that posting
kitten/puppy/pony/goats-in-coats/bird/heart-shaped clouds/misty morning
pictures and birthday greeting GIFs and other celebratory shout-outs to the
world are soporifics to an otherwise stressful world. Believe me, when I am in
my blind taking bird pictures, I’m in a very good place.
I think most of us have become sensitized to the need to
look around the FB discussion corner with a mirror on a long stick—if you get
my analogy (think Saving Private Ryan, a mirror and chewing gum)—before we poke
our dialogue-seeking heads out to make a point about almost anything.
I’m one of those long-stick-and-mirror types; either what I
see around the corner is safe enough to affirm that what awaits is open-mindedness
toward the remarks I am thinking of sharing, or what I see in the mirror tells
me all I need to know about the emotional violence that is awaiting me should I
venture forth with my free speech. I don’t know how the rest of you gauge the
possible outcome of the yes-I-will-no-I-won’t-step-around-the-corner decision,
but for me, a touch of caution seems like a sane choice.
Unless you are willing to live in a cave, sans any form of media, or you simply
have the enviable gumption to turn completely away from the news cycles
spinning around like endless banks of laundromat dryers on crack, you have seen
the descent of decency not only in social media, but in so many other quarters
of our daily lives.
It would be disingenuous of me to suggest that life when I
was growing up—with the Cleavers, the Nelsons, Gidget, and Father Knows Best
living all on the same neatly-trimmed cul-de-sac—represented some sort of
Halcyon days for Baby Boomers.
The televisions of the day were, compared to today’s HD
monsters, laughably tiny, rough resolution, and mostly black and white. We had
three, maybe four or five, channels we received with rabbit ear or rooftop
antennae. We had news programs featuring real reporters, respected anchors (a
relatively new term, by the way), and credible stories that lacked any bias or
points of view that had the potential to set neighbor against neighbor.
There were, of course, radio and television commentators,
and newspaper columnists who leaned left or right, and we knew that, but we
didn’t let our personal affection for, or affiliation with, a news personality
or a news company so blind us to the need for balance that we allowed wedges of
disagreement to split us up as Americans. Oh, my father hated—railed
against—the Washington Post—called it the Daily Pravda—and he preferred the
Washington Star, a kinder, gentler paper, in his opinion.
But you know what? Both papers landed on our driveway every
day, just as they did on the driveways of most of our neighbors. I have to say
that there were media scoundrels and scourges…columnists with axes to grind,
editorial cartoonists with sharp-tipped pens of poison…radio personalities who
loved to hear the roar of their own nutty voices…and news organizations that
were in one trench or the other during campaign seasons.
There were foes and fans of Huntley-Brinkley and Meet the
Press. Same with Howard K. Smith and Sam Donaldson or, later, Peter Jennings.
Barbara Walters took a huge beating for simply being a women brazen enough to
earn a spot in front of a camera. And what about that National Enquirer and
similar sensational rags?! Talk about fake news! But we knew it, and we did not have to tear each other apart to
prove a point not even worth making.
When the daily lineup of television shows ended around
eleven or midnight, some stations signed off with a “daily devotional” and then
the National Anthem. I’m not being wistful here…I’m just saying that what was
real for Americans back then was not corny or worthy of scorn or derision or
some comparative analysis ending in the taking of unalterable sides. We also
weren’t rubes about what was happening around us.
One only has to search through headlines of the major
papers of the 50s, 60s, and 70s to see images of, and read stories about,
racial violence, political corruption, social unrest, physical abuse (child and
spousal), crude and demeaning objectification of women, drug abuse, school
instability and segregation, inner-city blight, foreign entanglements,
infrastructure woes, crime ranging from petty to mob-based, poverty,
homelessness, veteran disenfranchisement, environmental pollution, corporate
greed, and, of course, wars. We had the Army-McCarthy
hearings in 1954, (Have you no sense of decency?”) for gosh’s sake, and the
Charles Whitman University
of Texas Tower shooting in 1966? All of these national ills were very much
a part of my life and the lives of all my friends, without exception.
[A personal aside] For
me and my Air Force family friends who lived in the Midwest on bomber bases surrounded
by missile silos, or on Army posts in Germany near the Fulda Gap, or at Naval
stations where submarine crews departed for months, we took life with a sort of
gallows humor. During the Cold War, we knew that when the balloon went up (or
the klaxons blared for real), our fathers would go away to do their jobs, and moms
and kids might just as well step out on our lawns or balconies and wait for the
bright flash that would end everything we knew. We didn’t worry about guns in
school, and “duck and cover” wasn’t an option; we worried about life on earth
as we knew it.
So where am I going with this backward-forward-sideways
looking? I’m simply pointing out two things:
One. America has always had social, political, economic, and
other systemic problems. From day one. We didn’t work them all out at once—it
took a Declaration, a war, a Constitution, another war, a few bad presidents
(one of whom whose goal was to eliminate an entire native-born population, and
his picture is nonetheless hung right there in the Oval Office), a great
president, a war, an assassination, a period of terrible decline and cultural
and economic abuse, another war, several amendments, another war, more
amendments, another war, and one more on top of that, then a colder war, an
assassination, then a very hot war, then protests, then civil rights crises,
more assassinations, a resignation, and on, and on, and on, with terrible
tragedy at home, and more wars abroad. Democracy is messy, painful, frustrating,
head-shaking, hurtful to some, unfair to others, ultimately unsatisfying in its
details, but somehow satisfying in its totality, in its sheer persistence to
not give up on the original idea.
Two. Until the advent of social media and its apparent transformation
into a digitized beast hammered out of an alloy of good intentions and hopeful
technology, but now infected and tarnished by the detritus of the worst human
motivations, Americans, for the most part, found a way to talk to each other
about core issues without fear of shaming, without seeing posters of themselves
spread large on public walls with hateful artwork and unspeakable words
spattered across them. We talked, we
stated our positions, we disagreed, we argued, we discussed, we debated, we
listened, and we either came together or we compromised. We rarely closed our
minds and our hearts to honestly-held positions stated openly and innocently.
Our disagreements were often messy—no doubt. There was
shouting, there was name-calling and there were hurtful things said and done.
But we did not for a moment think to walk down the middle of a crowded
street—the broad boulevard of American society—with a megaphone of hate, a bucket
of poison, and a box of hate-smeared nails, and single out the person with whom
we disagreed (and probably never met) and humiliate them, scourge them, crucify
them on a cross of misbegotten electrons and then disappear into a coward’s
world of anonymity and unaccountability.
“Oh really?” you counter. “What about the racism that
permeated the American conversation for so many decades? What about segregated
schools, ‘white-only’ signs, backs of busses, the Klan and the lynchings and
Jim Crow and the deaths of civil rights marchers and bus riders? What about the
Dreamers today; what about the millions of refugees fleeing the Hell of Syria;
what about the homeless, the sick, the aged without care? Those all exist
today. What have your platitudes and hand-wringings and scolding columns
accomplished to end all of that?”
I know where you are going with this, and you have a long
list of grievances that you think I have skimmed over or simply ignored. Your
points are legitimate; your reading of history is correct; your assessment of
our past and continued failings has merit.
Well, I can’t defend that list anymore than I can forget
that when I was a boy I heard words used to describe Jews, Italians, the Irish,
Mexicans, Poles, Central Europeans, Arabs, Japanese…that great population of
the global community that didn’t look, act, pray, eat, or sound like “us.” And
I did not stand up against that. I was too afraid to be honest with my shame. None
of that was, is, or ever will be made right to the satisfaction of those so
wounded or those who lost everything by such terribly inhumane deeds carried
out by Americans. I cannot unring my own bell of inaction.
But I will tell you this, and I believe it to my very core:
We must stop the shouting, the unyielding position-taking, the boastful lying,
the wanton, blatant disregard for compromising negotiations, the
winner-take-all STFU attitudes that permeate our social media and political
atmosphere. If we cannot wipe the slate of hate clean and learn anew to speak
in measured, respectful tones, using honest words, and attentive ears, we will
never be able to address the great problems of our time, and the problems that
will haunt our children and grandchildren.
No comments:
Post a Comment