Saturday, October 19, 2019

No, I'm Not That Hopeless: An Explanation

Ad Astra...Our Aspirations, Through Work,  Will Take us to the Stars
Earlier in the week, I posted, on Facebook, six predictions covering the current impeachment furor, the unelectability of the current crop of Democratic candidates, the likelihood that Trump will be re-elected in 2020, the continuing fall from grace of the American form of democracy, and my belief that the United States, already on the skids of international disrespect, will be relegated to a third- or fourth-place status economically, politically, militarily, and by most, if not all, humanitarian and environmental standards. I noted, “The few goodhearted citizens who try to right the ship will be marginalized and ridiculed.” In addition, I predicted that the trend toward oligarchy as the operating system of U.S. domestic governance will increase and, eventually dominate.


The responses to that post were predictable, particularly those from people who have followed my posts and blogs for several years, and who have assumed I am imbued with a relatively sunny, positive, and proactive sort of nature.

Some quotes:

“C'mon Jim. Please. Snap out of it. Progress begins with hope, and only ends with our common despair. I believe strongly that many of us would lay down their lives before your predictions come to pass.”

“Jim- this makes me very sad. My kids will only be in their 20s in 2030, just starting their adult lives. Your grandkids will be almost adults. There are too many good people who won’t let this happen. If Ukraine, if Hong Kong, etc., can do it, surely the USA can as well.” (honestly, the references to Ukraine and Hong Kong baffled me)

“I don’t buy it. Things will change for the good. That’s why I’m working so hard for the party.”

“Jim, look at the blue wave we had in the house last year. It’s possible. And from all the tiny voices, a giant roar!!!!” (Shades of Katy Perry)

“I'm surprised to read this from you, Jim. However I am reading the same all through my feed. The toxic landscape of DC is mostly confusing the country. So therefore rather than listen to the in-fighting ad nauseum, they may just stay with the status quo. Imagine if that's true, the Democratic party will be analyzing what they did wrong for years to come. The country is tired. The devil they know is better than the one they don't know...or something like that.”

“Jim, I pray you”re wrong.”

“I pray you are wrong Jim. As I told another. I will vote for a same sex president, a female president, etc. before i vote for a man even Harding would be shocked by.”

“I hope you are not correct ... I'm not giving in to them... never...”

And finally, there was this thoughtful, hopeful, appropriately angry reply from a millennial who is well-educated, very much an activist, and versed in the political world:

“Just because there aren’t any candidates you like doesn’t mean there’s no candidate who can win. You know that I STEEP myself in the political zeitgeist; I’m well aware of how dire things are, and I subscribe to the adage, “If you aren’t angry, you aren’t paying attention.” But this kind of nihilistic diatribe is counterproductive, and deeply disconcerting to someone who’s working hard to salvage a future for herself and for her siblings’ children. People my age are still ready to pull the levers on the guillotines and hold power to account. We’re ready to vote. We’re ready to do what it takes. We’re fired up. We’re in the streets, we’re making calls, we’re doing the work. You have a right to your despair, but, respectfully, your melodramatic alarmism is based in your feelings, not in reality. If you can’t be constructive, if your position is that nothing you do matters and therefore no one should bother to try, then you’re just one more Boomer who’s doomed us.”

A thoughtful reply seems necessary here, and I’ll take the writer’s points on, but not necessarily in order.

There are Democratic candidates I like, presidential and congressional, and to whose campaigns I have donated more than the minimum amount of money. I have, for example, donated to Pete Buttigieg, Valerie Plame, and Amy McGrath, among others. It should be noted that none of the candidates I support live in my home state of Virginia; I simply believe these candidates merit a broader blanket of support, none more so than McGrath. I will, in all likelihood, contribute to the campaign of the final presidential contender from the Democratic party. And, of course, I will vote against Trump. I never sit home on election day.

However, my contributions do not imply that I think, at the presidential level, the candidate of my choice, or any other choice, will win against the Trump machine. Something snapped in America in 2015-16—a torn ACL of national will that finally gave license to a portion of the electorate to rebel in the most egregious way. The candidate and the voters who supported him, despite his most despicable acts--mocking a disabled reporter, mocking a war hero and Gold Star families, using vile language about women, groping his daughter and laughing about dating her, paying off sexual liaisons…the list goes on and on—took advantage of a deep-seated and long-seething anger that was, like the Yellowstone magma dome, a super eruption waiting to happen. And no one of substance, even in his own party, stood against the obvious signs of catastrophe.

And yet it was all predictable, except no one, or no organization, was able to energize the public to such a degree that nationwide mobilization against poverty, racism, failing schools, and general malaise toward social issues would take hold. I was there in the midst of the March for our Lives in 2018, right along with hundreds if not thousands of men and women of my generation. The march was uplifting, but, ultimately, an empty calorie event that did not move the gun control needle one millimeter (or have I imagined the gun slaughters that continued afterward)? My advice to all those young people who have since turned 18: If you don’t vote in November, 2020, your march’s message will become a footnote in history.

It is an irritating meme that the Boomer generation is somehow responsible for the mess we’re in; that men and women born after World War II into a resurgent America where anything was possible are now the targets of the slings and arrows of Millennial anger. Make no mistake about our passion for change: we marched, we pulled the levers, we supported passages of Civil Rights and Education Acts, we stood for environmental changes, we died at Kent State and in Vietnam, our heroes were assassinated, our cities burned, our friends came home in body bags, our president lied, cheated, and stole. We were held hostage by gas-producing nations; our diplomats were held hostage by a terrorist nation.

Don’t begin to lecture us that we did nothing, paid no price, felt no pain. We had great hopes that by the turn of the 21st century the word racism would not even be in the dictionary; we had hopes that men and women of all colors, creeds, and beliefs would, in all cases, stand on equal ground; we believed that politicians would find ways to reach across the aisle and help end the threat of nuclear annihilation, humanitarian oppression, environmental rape, educational and economic disparity. And, before you throw it all back in my face, yes, we had Nixon, we had Iran-Contra, we had bad actors at all levels of politics. But nothing, nothing like what we have now.

Does this current generation think it is the first to open its eyes to the unresolved problems facing humanity…facing America…facing our families? Well, you’d better get past that sense of self-congratulatory hubris because my generation, and generations before, despite all our failings, all our mistakes and horrible decisions, were also trying to look forward to a better place for our children and our children’s children. We tried to help you get though college using borrowed funds (yes, I know you have your own debts); we nearly lost our shirts and homes in the 1987 market crash (a 22% drop on Black Monday, October 22). That one took about a third of all my family had. And then again in the 2008 recession, so many of us fell prey to unscrupulous banking, real-estate lies, and deceit. A lot of Boomer dreams dried up in those times.

I’m hardly an apologist for the wrongs my generation, and those before mine, committed: Our generation, and those before, were stained and emotionally bruised by the acts of bad, wicked, self-serving leaders—political and corporate and religious. We had McCarthy, the America Firsters, the steel and oil barons, the Tammany Hall gangs, the carpetbaggers, the money-pocketing evangelists, the mobsters, the lynch mobs, the fat-bellied sheriffs, the hucksters and shysters. Yes, we had them all—and they still exist, like cockroaches.

But above all of those evils were good, honest, hard-working people who fought our wars, who built our factories, who worked on cures for diseases, who cared for the sick and not thinking about insurance providers, who plowed the land on farms small and large, who taught our children for the sheer pleasure of passing on knowledge and not teaching to the test, who held on to the notion that ethics and fairness were foundational to the upward movement of family and society. How novel.

But a lot of us believed all that—I still do, and so do many of my Boomer contemporaries. And that was why the progressives of my generation marched, and contributed, and voted. But even though we were far from silent on some issues, we were slow to speak and act on other pressing matters. Did it take us far too long to embrace the LGBTQ community? Yes. Did we turn away from AIDS victims? Yes. Did we welcome, openly, honestly, incoming migrants fleeing oppression? Probably not. But some of us…I like to think quite a few of us…did wake up and leave our old skins and sins behind. And as we did that, we held out hope that if we could learn to move forward, the nation would too.

And that is why some who read my latest posts may wonder why I’m so angry. It’s not that I’m “one more Boomer who’s doomed us,” it’s that I’m one lone, voiceless, individual American who sees, increasingly, frustratingly, maddeningly, sorrowfully, how marginalized the middle and lower economic classes of my generation have become, and how imperiously—without effective pushback or powerful declamation—the current party in power—with fortune-filled war chests and consciousless enablers—has taken matches of denial, hatred and ignorance to the Constitution, the legislature, and the judiciary.

There was a time in America when barn-raising was a thing. Look it up. People gathered to help their neighbor raise a barn, or build a house or, in hard times, help plow a neighbor’s field and harvest a storm-threatened crop. There was a time when a man’s word was his bond, and a handshake was no less binding. There have been times—not often, but often enough to merit a mention—when political courage was more important than political capital.

Now, it is all position-taking, offering “plans” to address problems that will only cause more problems. It is pandering to the latest polls, to the “breaking news” outlets. It is shouting, name calling, character assassination, gaslighting, clawing and grasping up the greasy pole of power, boot heels on the faces and fingers of those struggling below. But most of all, it is lying to the electorate about how hard it is going to be to right the ship that is taking on water faster than we can bail.

Not one Democratic candidate has yet to say, “I’m going to have to raise taxes across the board, and while I’ll try to make it hard on the wealthy, everyone, but the most poor, will have to take a hit. You can’t have all the things you want without pain. Roads, fair housing, airports, health care, education, strong defense, clear water, sustainable agriculture, fair wages…all those important “things” and more have a cost, and a multi-trillion dollar debt is not part of my plan.” Give me that candidate and I’ll start to listen. But that’s not what Americans of any party want to hear. We want a custom-tailored way of life that works for us—the Brits call it “bespoke”--and we want our bespoke life delivered tomorrow. Maybe by Amazon Prime.

This is what we've sunk to, this is what we have visited on ourselves.

Those Americans who voted for Trump in 2016 don’t give a damn about democracy or the rule of law. They, like their president/savior, can't find Ukraine, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iraq, or Iran on a map, and they certainly have no idea what a Kurd is, nor do they care. It's all about what's in it for them. It’s about hiring an anti-Christ in a stolen blood-soaked flag to do their bidding. 
That’s how they will justify their vote in 2020. 

Well, my friends, if you want them to reap the wildest whirlwind they have ever seen, then prove me wrong…get out and make it happen. Open your windows and shout it out. And get to the damn polls. Because if you don’t, what you will have, contrary to Ben Franklin, will not be a republic, but something terrible beyond a monarchy.

Tuesday, September 17, 2019

Constitution Day And A More Perfect Union


[An excerpt from The Washington Post, September 17]

Constitution Day has its roots in a holiday once known as "I Am an American Day," designated by Congress in 1940 on the third Sunday in May to commemorate U.S. citizenship. In 1952, Congress, at the urging of an Ohio resident named Olga Weber, moved the day to Sept. 17 and renamed it Constitution Day. Sept. 17 was chosen because it was the last session of the 1787 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, during which the final version of the newly written Constitution was signed by 39 delegates.

It wasn’t until 2004 that Congress took action again on the day, this time approving a resolution to require that all schools that receive federal funding offer some type of “educational program” on the Constitution. The law doesn’t define what those lessons should be — and there is no penalty for not doing it — but across the country, schools at all grade levels have found ways to teach and learn about the Constitution.”

The article from which the above paragraphs was taken—“Nine myths about the U.S. Constitution,” by Valerie Strauss—offers a broad overview of the Constitution’s authorship, signatories, and contents. The totality of articles, papers, books and media searches about the Constitution probably are more numerous than the population of the United States itself (a Google search query on “U.S. Constitution” returned 357 million hits). It is safe to say that among purely secular texts, copies of the U.S. Constitution—from convenient coat-pocket versions to exquisitely engrossed replicas--exceed the number of almost any other federal document, save, perhaps, the Declaration of Independence.

I’m guessing that despite the easy availability of the Constitution, e.g. https://constitutionus.com/, it is probably not as thoroughly read more than two centuries later as the Founders might have hoped it would be back in 1787. In truth, it wasn’t all that appreciated at the time of its signing, and, except for those self-minted Americans who could read and who had the wherewithal to own a copy, the text of the Constitution was elusive and limited to state houses, courthouses, libraries (such as they were), publishers, and institutions of higher learning. And yet that final draft of the Constitution (plus the Bill of Rights), along with the Declaration of Independence and (in my opinion) the Federalist Papers, define the bedrock principles and pillars of republican (lowercase r) ideals upon which the whole of our democracy rests.

For me, Constitution Day is every day, and September 17 is merely a convenient bookmark in the 365-page year. To my mind, the Constitution is a living document that informs me in some way almost daily. I am not a strict constructionist, conservative textualist, or a liberal interpreter of the Constitution. To me, the document and all its Amendments, along with the Federalist Papers (which serve as a roadmap to understanding the mindsets of—and the debates among—the Founders), represents the struggle of a very small group of humanly-flawed, morally-conflicted men to create an enduring secular canon capable of encompassing both their world of privilege and the more commonplace world of the average colonist—the new Americans.

There should be no more intellectual oxygen left in any conversation about the moral rectitude or lack thereof of the Constitution’s authors and signatories. We in the 21st century, fraught as our time is with racism, gender and income inequality, isolationism, and fear-mongering false-prophet boogeymen migrating from left to right (to mention but a few of our “modern” failings), do not own—nor have we earned--sufficient righteousness or purity of character to sneer at the long-term value of the Constitution viewed through the clouded glass of slavery and misogyny that so often obscures the overarching intent of imperfect Founders.

Imperfect Founders. Why do I seem to fall back on that so much? Well, let’s look at the Preamble to the Constitution for a clue: 
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect [my italics] Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

“…in order to form a more perfect union….” Not a perfect union, but a more perfect union. Think about that specific coupling. It tell us that the Founders could not claim the new nation was perfect right from the start; they could not say that every aspect of the Constitution they had written described an already perfect union; they could only lay claim to laying out a plan for aspiring to perfection, which is a perfectly human goal.

When I was a freshman at a Jesuit high school in Shreveport, Louisiana in the early 1960s (I am not a Catholic, but the school was guided by principles my father believed would prepare me in ways the public schools at the time in Shreveport could not—in his opinion), I was given an English assignment to write a short essay—probably 250-300 words. I wrote the paper, turned it in, and the next day it was handed back to me with a 99 on it. I looked for the offending error, a mark that pointed to some grammar or spelling flaw, but I could not find any marked error. That night at home, my parents looked the paper over and, being pretty good writers themselves, they, too, worried over the missing percentage point and absence of some sort of mark or teacher’s notation that explained the 99.

After class the following day, I approached my teacher, Father Elsner (who was also the Prefect of Discipline) and asked him to show me the error in my paper. Without looking down at the essay, Father Elsner said, “Moore, it is only in the next life that we will achieve perfection.” It was a lesson in humility—spiritual and secular—that I never forgot, even though I did rate 100s from Father Elsner over the course of my time at Jesuit.

The phrase, “in order to form a more perfect union” is, to me, a clear call for individual and collective humility as we work to perfect the living fabric of our laws and governing principles. It is doubtful we will ever achieve a perfect union because we are a nation of imperfect citizens and imperfect leaders. That is not, perforce, a denigration; it is, to my mind, a challenge from the Founders. 

The authors of the Preamble gave themselves, and us, a goal to aspire to a more perfect union with every helpful law made, every bad law repealed, every amendment added, every amendment crossed out. One only has to read the Federalist Papers to understand the struggles the Constitution’s authors endured as they turned the Rubik’s Cube of a democratic republic over and over, shaping their arguments to fit not only the crises of their time, but the crises they knew were sure to arise in a distant future.

One of my favorite songs from the musical “Hamilton” is “Dear Theodosia,” a duet sung by Hamilton and Burr. In it, both men sing to their children, Philip Hamilton and Theodosia Burr, born after the Revolution, and what the world for their children could be like if the Founders’ dreams are realized.
“You will come of age with our young nation
 We'll bleed and fight for you,
we'll make it right for you
If we lay a strong enough foundation
We'll pass it on to you,
we'll give the world to you
And you'll blow us all away
Someday, someday
Yeah, you'll blow us all away
Someday, someday”

“If we lay a strong enough foundation….” is what Constitution Day is all about. The Constitution is a strong foundation for which much blood has been shed and for which, by oath, much great immortal honor has been earned. On this day—and on every day—let us not point out our imperfections with epithets, blame, and rancor, but let us, instead, aspire to continue in the work of the Founders and strive together to form a more perfect union for the generations to come. If we can hew to that often-rugged road, someday, someday, our children’s children will blow us all away.